Solid-State LiDAR
Overview
Solid-state LiDAR refers to laser radars without macro-scale mechanical moving parts. Compared to traditional mechanical rotating LiDARs, solid-state LiDARs offer higher reliability, smaller form factors, and lower cost potential. They are considered the key direction for LiDAR technology transitioning from R&D to large-scale mass production.
Mechanical vs. Solid-State: Why Solid-State Is Needed
| Dimension | Mechanical Rotating | Solid-State |
|---|---|---|
| Moving Parts | Motor-driven rotation | No macro-scale moving parts |
| Lifespan | ~10,000 hours | ~100,000 hours |
| Size | Larger (rotation space needed) | Compact |
| Weight | 500g - 2kg | 100g - 500g |
| FOV | Horizontal 360 deg | Limited (60-120 deg) |
| Reliability | Vibration/shock sensitive | High reliability (automotive grade) |
| Cost (Mass Production) | High (precision machining) | Low (semiconductor process) |
| Automotive Certification | Difficult | Easier to achieve |
FOV Limitation
The biggest limitation of solid-state LiDARs is the inability to achieve 360-degree omnidirectional scanning. Solutions include combining multiple solid-state LiDARs for full surround coverage, or using a single sensor for specific applications (e.g., forward perception).
Solid-State LiDAR Technology Routes
graph TD
A[Solid-State LiDAR Technology Routes] --> B[MEMS Micro-Mirror]
A --> C[OPA Optical Phased Array]
A --> D[Flash LiDAR]
A --> E[Prism/Wedge Mirror Rotation]
A --> F[FMCW Solid-State]
B --> B1[MEMS mirror controls laser direction<br>RoboSense RS-M1]
C --> C1[Electronically controlled beam steering<br>Quanergy, Analog Photonics]
D --> D1[Area emission/reception<br>Ibeo, Continental]
E --> E1[Small optical element rotation<br>Livox Mid-360]
F --> F1[Frequency modulation + coherent detection<br>Aeva, SiLC]
MEMS Micro-Mirror Scanning
Principle: Uses MEMS-fabricated micro-mirrors to deflect the laser beam direction, achieving 2D scanning.
Where \(\theta_0\) is the maximum deflection angle and \(f\) is the mirror resonant frequency.
Technical Features:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Scanning Method | 1D or 2D MEMS mirror rapid oscillation |
| Advantages | Mature technology, controllable cost, mass-producible |
| Disadvantages | Mirror is still a moving part (microscale), limited shock resistance |
| FOV | Typically 60-120 deg |
| Representative Products | RoboSense RS-M1, Innoviz InnovizTwo |
Workflow:
- Laser emits a pulse
- MEMS mirror deflects the laser to the target direction
- Reflected light returns through the same MEMS mirror
- Detector receives and measures time of flight
- MEMS mirror oscillates rapidly to cover the entire FOV
OPA Optical Phased Array
Principle: Similar to phased-array radar, uses phase differences among multiple emitting elements to control the laser beam direction, achieving purely electronic beam steering.
Where:
- \(\lambda\) is the laser wavelength
- \(\Delta\varphi\) is the phase difference between adjacent elements
- \(d\) is the element spacing
Technical Features:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Scanning Method | Purely electronic phase adjustment |
| Advantages | Truly no moving parts, extremely fast scanning, random access |
| Disadvantages | High technical difficulty, limited power, sidelobe issues |
| Status | R&D stage, few commercial products |
| Representative | Quanergy (bankrupt), MIT/Caltech research |
OPA Challenges
OPA is theoretically the ideal solid-state solution, but faces technical challenges in element count, emission power, and sidelobe suppression. Commercialization progress has been slow, and large-scale deployment is unlikely in the near term.
Flash LiDAR
Principle: Similar to a camera's "flash," illuminates the entire scene at once, using an area detector array (e.g., SPAD array) to simultaneously receive reflected signals from all directions.
Technical Features:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Scanning Method | No scanning, parallel area detection |
| Advantages | No moving parts, high frame rate, simple structure |
| Disadvantages | Short range (energy dispersal), resolution limited by array size |
| Suitable Scenarios | Close range (<30m), blind-spot coverage, gesture recognition |
| Representative | Ibeo, Continental, Apple iPad LiDAR |
Flash LiDAR's distance limitation stems from energy conservation:
Covering more pixels or longer distances requires more emission power, constrained by eye safety standards.
Prism/Wedge Mirror Rotation (Livox Approach)
Principle: Uses one or more small rotating prisms to change the laser direction, producing a unique non-repetitive scan pattern.
Technical Features:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Scanning Method | Small prism rotation (semi-solid-state) |
| Advantages | Low cost, higher reliability, non-repetitive scanning improves equivalent resolution |
| Disadvantages | Strictly speaking not purely solid-state, still has small moving parts |
| Representative | Livox Mid-360, HAP, Avia |
Non-repetitive scanning coverage:
Where \(C(T)\) is the FOV coverage within integration time \(T\), and \(\lambda\) is the scan density parameter. Coverage exponentially approaches 100% with increasing time.
FMCW Solid-State LiDAR
Principle: Combines FMCW ranging with solid-state beam control (OPA or MEMS) for coherent detection.
Technical Features:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Ranging Principle | Frequency-modulated continuous wave (coherent detection) |
| Advantages | Simultaneous distance + velocity, strong anti-interference, high sensitivity |
| Disadvantages | Highest technical complexity, high cost |
| Representative | Aeva Aeries II, SiLC Eyeonic |
Key advantage -- Instantaneous velocity measurement:
Traditional ToF LiDAR can only estimate velocity through consecutive frame differencing, while FMCW can directly obtain radial velocity from a single measurement.
Livox Mid-360 in Detail
Livox Mid-360 is currently one of the most popular solid-state (semi-solid-state) LiDARs in robotics.
Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Range | 40m (@10% reflectivity), 70m (@80%) |
| FOV | 360 x 59 deg (-7 to +52 deg) |
| Point Rate | 200,000 pts/s |
| Scanning Method | Non-repetitive rotating prism |
| Accuracy | +/-2cm (@0.2m-10m) |
| Returns | Dual return |
| Built-in IMU | 6-axis, 200Hz |
| Interface | 100M Ethernet |
| Size | 63.18mm diameter x 47.98mm |
| Weight | ~265g |
| Power | 5.5W (typical) |
| Protection | IP67 |
| Operating Temperature | -20 to +55 deg C |
| Price | ~$1,099 |
Non-Repetitive Scanning Pattern
graph LR
subgraph "Integration Time Effect"
A["50ms<br>Low Coverage"] --> B["100ms<br>Medium Coverage"]
B --> C["200ms<br>High Coverage"]
C --> D["500ms<br>Near-Full Coverage"]
end
As integration time increases, the scan pattern gradually fills the entire FOV, with equivalent resolution continuously improving. This is the core advantage of Livox over traditional line-scanning LiDARs.
Typical Applications
- Quadruped robots: Lightweight, 360-deg FOV, built-in IMU, suitable for FAST-LIO2/Point-LIO
- Drone mapping: Lightweight, low power
- Service robots: 3D perception and obstacle avoidance
- Low-speed autonomous driving: Campus logistics vehicles, delivery robots
Technology Route Comparison
| Technology Route | Maturity | Cost | Performance | Mass Production Difficulty | Main Bottleneck |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEMS Micro-Mirror | 4/5 | Medium | Good | Medium | Mirror reliability |
| Prism Rotation | 4/5 | Low | Good | Low | Not purely solid-state |
| Flash | 3/5 | Low | Medium (short range) | Low | Range limitation |
| OPA | 2/5 | High | High potential | High | Power, sidelobes |
| FMCW | 3/5 | High | Excellent | High | System complexity |
Future Trends for Solid-State LiDAR
- Cost reduction: As production scales up, automotive-grade solid-state LiDAR prices will drop to \(200-\)500
- Chipification: Integrating emitter, scanner, receiver, and processor into a single chip (SoC LiDAR)
- FMCW adoption: 4D LiDAR (range + velocity) will become the next-generation standard
- Camera fusion: Integrating LiDAR and camera in the same sensor module
- 1550nm wavelength: Eye-safe + higher power = longer range
References
- Livox Technical White Paper: https://www.livoxtech.com
- LiDAR Technologies and Systems - SPIE
- Aeva FMCW Technical Documentation
- RoboSense RS-M1 Product Specifications
- Hesai FT120 Technical Data